Perception is reality, the saying goes. Modern players can never transcend time, athletes only care about the money and the fan is never wrong. Yet, all you need to do is dig a little deeper to find the truth. As a freelance sportswriter, my job is to give the audience a story around what just happened. As a consumer, I expect that sports will always provide more than I bargained for. As a fan, my hopes are to be enlightened by more than points. Welcome to the mind of a sports scribe.
Showing posts with label Shutdown Corner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shutdown Corner. Show all posts
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Leavenworth
It’s time for the obligatory Michael Vick piece!
Well, maybe that’s a bit strange. See Scribe usually doesn’t follow the blogosphere script in terms of writing about the salacious controversies as they happen unless there is something that must be said.
Wednesday's prison release of Michael Vick has inspired all sorts of opinions, but it’s the extreme sides of these thoughts that always get attention.
There are presumably millions of people out there who think that the former Virginia Tech standout hasn’t been punished enough for his crime. Nineteen months in the all-male, medium-security USP Leavenworth was some sort of slap on the wrist for someone who was a responsible party for the mutilation of animals for nearly six years.
There are presumably millions of people out there who think that the former Atlanta Falcons star (the team has his rights, but he’ll never suit up for it again) has not only served his penance, but should be afforded the same chances to gain his former standing in society as anyone else exiting prison. Jails were ideally built to not only keep the public’s gravest offenders away, but to possibly deter some of their inhabitants from ever returning.
There are presumable millions of people out there who think that the player whom Hall of Famer quarterback Steve Young once said has a chance to be better than he ever was – which is saying something – shouldn’t have spent one minute in jail. As MJD points out on Shutdown Corner, there are active players in the league who were not incarcerated for what can be considered far more serious crimes such as vehicular manslaughter, DUI/DWUI (as discussed here recently) or sexual assault.
There are voices from supporters and antagonists of PETA, citizens disillusioned by the conduct of athletes or the legal system and the denizens of a football-mad nation following the speculation of his next stop. Yet, regardless of what we may believe, there are only a few voices and opinions that matter when it comes to reclaiming Vick’s future.
For starters, as we have seen since he took over as Commissioner in 2006, Roger Goodell will be the greatest barrier to re-entry into the NFL. Chris Henry was arrested several times before he was hit with an eight-game suspension. Terry “Tank” Johnson was dealt with a half-season ban of his own after his legal troubles. Adam “Pacman” Jones has been given two lengthy suspensions under Goodell’s conduct policy, including a current indefinite suspension after another (idiotic) folly. However, only Johnson spent actual time in the can before Goodell meted out his league punishment; four months after violating probation during the Chicago Bears’ Super Bowl march in 2006.
We’re assuming that Vick is going to suit up for an NFL team right away, but if Johnson sat out for eight games on top of a four-month sentence, what could Vick get for being incarcerated for a year and a half?
Vick, himself, must appear more than remorseful for ending up in prison and losing millions, but at least publicly remorseful of his acts. He’s going to have the biggest media circus in the United States following him since Bernie Madoff the moment he finishes his house arrest in July. Add the protesters and the random people who want to make their feelings known, and he’s going to have to do much more than say the right things.
Kevin Sullivan, a public relations guru with extensive experience in both the political and sports worlds, laid out a suggested PR campaign on Shutdown Corner that could possibly placate all the interested parties as Vick’s talent and age (he’s just 29 years old, remember) will certainly land him another job. Whether one holds PR/publicity as a noble field is a moot point here, but what Sullivan’s four points reflect is a chance at not only salvaging what can still be a productive career, but a chance at a second act that could serve a grander purpose than merely getting a roster spot again in the NFL.
A third voice that matters here is one that few, if anyone, have mentioned. The fraternity of NFL players is going to deal with the most unique distraction since the September 11th attacks in 2001. Before anyone interprets this as comparing terrorist attacks to the resurrection of an athlete’s career, let it be understood that this is speaking about the immediate media frenzy they will face on top of what they deal with on a normal basis. They will be hit with a constant stream of questions, demands for statements and some will give those always convenient “unnamed player” quotes.
To save you the trouble, here’s what will be asked by some of my fellow pigskin scribes: “what do you think of Michael Vick’s return?”, “do you think he deserves a second chance?” and “would you want him on your team?”. Truthfully, they’re not terrible questions to ask, but the responses might be influenced by the timing of Goodell’s decision, team personnel needs and how much hell PETA will raise between now and then. Some of the former teammates who openly supported Vick will find the spotlight shone on them. Washington’s Clinton Portis was derided for his opinion on the matter when Vick was indefinitely suspended before his trial, but you’d be foolish to believe he is the lone player in the league that feels that “they’re just a bunch of dogs”. Even those players who condemned Vick will see an extra mic or camera to see if they can forgive and forget.
If his release presented a caldron of reactions, we can only imagine what will take place in eight weeks. On July 20th, Michael Vick will have finished serving his entire sentence after two months of home confinement. By that summer Monday, several teams will have already started their training camps for the 2009 season while others will be setting up shop in towns across the country. From that day forward, position battles will be decided by performances, salary concerns and devastating injuries. Each personnel decision made by coaches and managers will be influenced by those very battles, but you can expect that Vick’s name will be connected to nearly every one of them.
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Loaded
In person and via text, a few have asked for an opinion on the Plaxico Burress saga because of the Giants beat for the New York Beacon. With all due respect, I don't feel that it's appropriate for me to add any cents to this piggy bank of opinion.
For starters, despite my gig, what more can I add that hasn't been said?
While I am one of the 200+ members of the home media corps, just a few of us have the access and credibility (which with some organizations is questionable) to even go beyond the sidelines in search of non-football matters. They are not only paid to be investigative reporters in the sports world, but they have a wherewithal in this business that in all honesty, I don't have yet.
Beyond that, there's an expectation that when someone joins the media, that it is in the job description to seek out the juicy, outlandish, seedy, shady, negative and absurd in the subject (s)he covers. Considering the paper that I write for - a small weekly paper which is available to just about 100,000 readers; 1.25% of the NYC population - the priority with our sports division is less about salaciousness and more about using a forward-looking lens into the upcoming action of the coming days.
However, this is where Scribe would come in, right? Not exactly.
To quote MJD of the occasionally-referenced Yahoo! Sports blog, Shutdown Corner:
While questioning what has been going through the minds of Burress and his teammates, Antonio Pierce and Ahmad Bradshaw, we have also been asking about the law itself, which has made a dent in Mayor Michael Bloomberg's campaign for gun law reform.
We've been chatting about how Mayor Mike, whose controversial decision to repeal the term limits law through City Council instead of popular vote, may have cinched his third four-year stint if his calls to put Burress' feet to the fire are answered.
We've been talking about the 'average Joe/Jaquon/Javier/Jin' who got caught with an unlicensed burner back in 2006 is probably hoping that the mandatory 3 1/2 year sentence that Burress could face isn't negotiable because of his fame and finances.
We've wondered why hasn't there been an equal amount of scrutiny for a law that ideally prohibits a crime that usually puts more people in danger than what Burress committed; DUI.
We've been wondering why once again, society will close its mouth about the people next door doing far worse, but scream to the high heavens about another athlete's mishap.
Far more will be said, asked and turned into snarky fodder from people who salivate for something to use new material on. Just not here.
Instead, look here and here.
For starters, despite my gig, what more can I add that hasn't been said?
While I am one of the 200+ members of the home media corps, just a few of us have the access and credibility (which with some organizations is questionable) to even go beyond the sidelines in search of non-football matters. They are not only paid to be investigative reporters in the sports world, but they have a wherewithal in this business that in all honesty, I don't have yet.
Beyond that, there's an expectation that when someone joins the media, that it is in the job description to seek out the juicy, outlandish, seedy, shady, negative and absurd in the subject (s)he covers. Considering the paper that I write for - a small weekly paper which is available to just about 100,000 readers; 1.25% of the NYC population - the priority with our sports division is less about salaciousness and more about using a forward-looking lens into the upcoming action of the coming days.
However, this is where Scribe would come in, right? Not exactly.
To quote MJD of the occasionally-referenced Yahoo! Sports blog, Shutdown Corner:
But we're now a couple of days removed from the breaking of the news, everyone's had their fun, and the initial gut reactions and pointing and laughing are out of the way. What I'm left with is a feeling that someone who isn't a bad guy could be going to jail for a long, long time.And that's the truth, really. For those who have been dying to know, from the few interactions I've had with him, Burress really isn't a bad guy even if his personal travails cause the public to believe that he is. Internally, I've been wondering why hundreds in the sports media who have never been in the Giants' lockerroom suddenly have a strong opinion about Burress, the organization or the NFL's gun culture, even if they make valid points. In private, obviously, there have been very active discussions in the Clinkscales household about this matter. At work, it's been a point of conversation without a doubt. Yet, these discussions come about because this incident, as many involving professional athletes, actually unearths more layers about our society than we care to admit.
While questioning what has been going through the minds of Burress and his teammates, Antonio Pierce and Ahmad Bradshaw, we have also been asking about the law itself, which has made a dent in Mayor Michael Bloomberg's campaign for gun law reform.
We've been chatting about how Mayor Mike, whose controversial decision to repeal the term limits law through City Council instead of popular vote, may have cinched his third four-year stint if his calls to put Burress' feet to the fire are answered.
We've been talking about the 'average Joe/Jaquon/Javier/Jin' who got caught with an unlicensed burner back in 2006 is probably hoping that the mandatory 3 1/2 year sentence that Burress could face isn't negotiable because of his fame and finances.
We've wondered why hasn't there been an equal amount of scrutiny for a law that ideally prohibits a crime that usually puts more people in danger than what Burress committed; DUI.
We've been wondering why once again, society will close its mouth about the people next door doing far worse, but scream to the high heavens about another athlete's mishap.
Far more will be said, asked and turned into snarky fodder from people who salivate for something to use new material on. Just not here.
Instead, look here and here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
