Showing posts with label WWE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WWE. Show all posts

Monday, June 22, 2009

Look-a-like

Maybe it's because I'm procrastinating while on deadline for the Beacon, but while channel surfing a bit, I was reminded of one of those look-a-like comparisons or "what happens if two random stars had a kid" posts that you might see online from time to time. Since it was never published here before, I figured that I might want to run this by the people.

Whenever I see this guy, the first thing that comes to mind isn't his game or the fact that he'll be featured prominently leading into Thursday night's NBA Draft. It's this:

Ryan Hurst (or for your sports movie fans, the actor who played Gerry Bertier in Remember the Titans) +


Randy Orton (slightly unhinged WWE Superstar) =


Blake Griffin, the soon-to-be latest centerpiece of the Los Angeles Clippers.


Now, can I get a "LEFT SIDE! STRONG SIDE!"?

Monday, May 12, 2008

Different

So, it wasn't just a weekend of brief pleasure (Blue Man Group is highly recommended and the weather was just great), but it was also a working weekend.

Hopefully it pays off.

Because the cable decided to go wacky upon the return home, I had no clue that my pseudo-top-secret article was posted, but here it is.

It's a different form of writing of a completely different genre. I've written about wrestling (or at least mentioned it) before, but this was a great challenge.

Many thanks to 411mania.com and my boy, JP Prag, for having me as a guest writer. Hopefully, it's enjoyed by all audiences and it'll be a start of something special.

Hidden Highlights 05.12.08 - Issue #141

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Admission

Stephanie Stepp, the host of the show I contribute to called ‘What’s Going On’ on WHCR here in Harlem, sends a weekly press release to all of her listeners and contributors the day prior to her Sunday broadcast. While this week’s release has a heavy boxing focus because of the huge fight between Shane Mosley and Miguel Cotto, she brought up an interesting point about the change in sports conversations over the years. In the past, people would speak about compelling play by some of the all-time greats in amazement, building stories of their legends through street corner conversations and burgeoning pride in communities across the land. These days, the mere mention of a terrific player brings about suspicion, doubt and blind curiosity about how the player became great. It’s no longer enough to be the absolute best in the game, but an athlete at any level has to become great without some sort of assistance or clouded circumstance.

The words ‘assistance’ and ‘clouded circumstance’ are code for steroids, performance-enhancers and doping. Trying to connect people to potential use has been difficult because of the lack of cooperation or even the resistance to admit to something they may not feel is entirely wrong. Yet this is where our sports conversations these days have steered to; the questions and scrutiny of what would have just been extraordinary achievements in the past.

There were two seemingly small moments this week that sounded the alarm for this entry. The first involved Mike Golic (below), the former defensive lineman for Notre Dame and in the NFL who is the co-host of ESPN’s highly-popular ‘Mike and Mike’ radio show. On November 7th, Golic coyly admitted to using steroids at one point in his NFL career, but it wasn’t until two days later that a caller asked him flat out if he did while discussing the Troy Williamson story. Golic reiterated what he said earlier in the week and elaborated on why, saying that he used them when trying to recover from injury.

The second moment may not lend itself much discussion these days, but profound, nonetheless. CNN interviewed injured WWE star John Cena (l.) for a ‘documentary’ which aired this week. “Death Grip: Inside Pro Wrestling” was supposed to highlight the lowlights of the industry, continuing to profile the sports entertainment genre in the aftermath of the murder/suicide committed by Chris Benoit back in June. The interview shows Cena skirting around the question of performance-enhancing, however, the WWE has defended itself by posting the unedited interview contrasting with the broadcasted question. Cena denies use and further explains the complication with the question.

These notes in sports news this week raised an eyebrow not because of who was involved or even because of the responsibility of the news organizations to find the truth (or in ESPN’s case, casually ignore). They made me think because as a fan and media type who wanted to play sports, I wonder at times about what would make an athlete take a chance to use enhancers. It has been easy to lay into players for using or just been accused of using. It has been second nature to demand accountability from sports leagues and nowadays, government. Yet, there are few people who are willing to speak in defense of users, to boldly explain exactly why athletes find it necessary to circumvent rules and laws for enhancers. For those who have, such as Golic, what may seem like a valid reason can turn into an excuse for ‘cheating’ in the eyes of those who think of enhancing as an unfair advantage and immoral deed. Whether you are a follower of professional wrestling or not, Cena’s point about answering the question may sound as if he waffled, but it speaks to the point of trying to validate athletic achievement in this era. Can an athlete be honest with the question and truthful with his or her choices without facing intense criticism and jeopardize his of her career? Can an athlete explain why (s)he used without fear of incriminating others and being blacklisted from participating in sports? Does doping and enhancing make athletes as crazed, evil, over the top and devious as this?

Probably one of the few issues that President George W. Bush can highlight as a success in his time in the White Hose is the sudden aggressive nature towards athletes and the use of performance enhancers. If you recall during his 2004 State of the Union, Bush discussed this issue in the context of the War on Drugs and the need for children to have strong role models. What seemed out of left field in that speech – especially being that he was a part owner of the Texas Rangers – almost four years ago has the look of a mandate followed to a T these days. Federal agents are busting pharmacies with illegal connections to these drugs. School districts across the nation are debating or actually instituting drug testing policies for their student-athletes. More importantly, all media are getting in on the fun, further supporting the strength of Bush’s mandate.

Today, we find out about more allegations than we find out about upcoming games. Today, we see HGH pop up on the TV screen as ‘breaking news’, no matter how much of the story is available for public consumption. When Paul Byrd admitted to having a prescription for human growth hormone shortly after the Cleveland Indians made the ALCS, it took away attention from what was turning into a potential dream story for a city thirsting for a championship. With all of the venom and hysteria, it’s hard to find out what’s really going on and why. These most recent insights from Byrd, Golic and Cena are telling society something if it pays attention.

Because he wasn’t a record holder or integral part to a Super Bowl winner, Golic’s admission won’t exactly push the NFL or ESPN to publicly support, deny or acknowledge that players will use steroids to get back on the field after injury to keep their jobs. Because the WWE has been further vilified after the Benoit tragedy – and the Federal Government has only desired now to clean up professional wrestling despite getting to Vince McMahon in 1993 – Cena’s edited words may still be used as fuel for the continued fight against performance enhancers, if people even care to listen. And let’s be honest, Byrd isn’t Roger Clemens. So while Stephanie is definitely right in wondering why the topic of those barbershop conversations has shifted some, we are trapped in only thinking from a fan's or media head's perspective.

Right now, an active player that is recuperating from a major injury and hoping to get back to the field of play is debating what to do. Should (s)he add an enhancer to speed up the recovery and train sooner in hopes of reclaiming the skills and confidence prior to the injury? Should the athlete let nature completely take its course and risk the chance of never being the same? No matter which side of the fence you are on, you can’t forget that there aren’t that many people in the world who have crafted and tuned their entire physical, mental and emotional being to make a living as a pro athlete or play to become one. So, honestly ask yourself this question:

What would you do?

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Complicated

I have never been one to pull out the morality card, or at least try not to, but tragedy brings about questions that challenge our sense of right and wrong.

How do we explain the transgressions of others to children?

It always sounds hackneyed these days to hear "for the sake of the children", "to protect our youth" or "set an example for our young ones". It's politician-speak that has become sports-speak thanks to Major League Baseball's continued probe about performance-enhancers and the personal fouls of NFL players. While proof is limited at best, baseball players are no longer automatic role models because of this steroids cloud. It has been decades since football players have been viewed as model citizens, but with the recent conduct policy enacted by Commissioner Roger Goddell, the gladiators of the gridiron will have even more to prove before having guest spots on Sesame Street.

So what is happening now throughout the wrestling community is something all too familiar to the sports nation, though no one would care to admit it.

Whether you consider wrestling/'rasslin serious entertainment or mindless programming is irrelevant as there are many fans, including myself, who live in both worlds with the knowledge of what's sports and sports entertainment. Both worlds share the greatest common denominator; television brings these men and woman to our lives in a manner that the musical note nor the written word can. For decades, we have been able to watch with our own eyes the growth and decline of these athletes. Unlike music, which ideally reflects the human condition, televised sports bring about instant identification with its viewers based on the fact that body language speaks volumes. Unlike words, which can be erased to one's liking, televised sports (even with some scripting) shows how unpredictable the human body can truly be. We are amazed by what these athletes do and in hopes of determining who they are as people, we speculate on their off-field personas based on quotes, reports and heresay.

And so the murder-suicide of WWE wrestler Chris Benoit, his wife and young son, have struck the minds and hearts of the wrestling community more than any other passing in recent memory, let alone ever. He had called the company shortly before the Vengeance pay-per-view Sunday in Houston, citing a "family emergency" in his suburban Atlanta home. Just a couple of hours before what was to be a special three-hour edition of RAW, AP reports circulated about the deaths of the Benoits, scrapping all plans of the evening's show (and possibly its controversial storyline of "Mr. McMahon's" death). It wasn't until later in the evening in which it was announced that this would be a murder-suicide investigation.

Benoit was an admired performer by peers, fans and wrestling media alike, something that is rare in any form of entertainment. Even rarer than his wide cast of admirers was hearing the words "that match sucked!" The consumnate professional who worked up the ladder, it took the native Canadian nearly twenty years to attain headliner status, winning the World Heavyweight title at Wrestlemania 20 in 2004. It's been widely reflected that he was an extremely private individual, but even with this apparent "aloofness", he was well-liked and loved. If this story sounds familiar to the non-wrestling fans, it should.

Part of this story has a scent of the Kobe Bryant sexual assault allegations in 2003. Much of this may sound like Ray Lewis in 2000 when he was tried for double murder (technically obstruction of justice). With the exception of suicide, Rae Carruth's name could creep up in comparison. Maurice Clarrett, Carlton Dotson (below-top), Mike Danton (below-bottom), Adam "Pacman" Jones... These are a few the most extreme situations just since the turn of the century. A select few involve high-profile players who have won not only the respect of their fans, peers and media within their sport, but have won championships at the highest level. They became more than players, but ambassadors of the sport they play. Yet, at the second the darkest clouds hang over these athletes, their images are tarnished, if not destroyed. The same has now happened to this wrestler.

What makes this situation unique, even in the now-familiar 24-hour news cycle, is that wrestling is considered low-brow in the spectrum of athletics. The judgments, even prior to the conclusion that Benoit killed his wife and son before taking his own life, have ranged from the plausible to the confusing to the downright stupid. Because it's wrestling, this couldn't be a general case of athlete-gone-bad, where because of the celebrity and favor, the attacks go directly to the offender. Instead, the first words that have come out of people's mouths are "roid rage" and "who cares? It's wrestling!"

First and foremost, there is no way to condone or even sympathize what Benoit had done. It is beyond sickening and cowardly.

Secondly, while surprising to all concerned, something as this proves that there was much more at play than just the simple and ludicrous label as 'roid rage'. In general society, do we look to blame barbituates and empty bottles of Hennessey when we hear of a murder-suicide? Not immediately, if at all in many cases. The crime is beyond senseless, but why cannot it be as simple as Benoit being a bad guy? It was easy to cast aspersions on Bryant, even as his image was not helped by his bickering with Shaquille O'Neal and the Lakers. It was easy to lay into Lewis when he was arrested, just as it has been the joke-of-the-day to speak about Adam Jones or Terry "Tank" Johnson. The men were held accountable, nothing else.

Finally, no matter how snobbish all of us become about something we love, it is unfair, irresponsible and pathetic to take pot-shots at the wrestling industry because of these events. If this was done to any other form of sport and/or entertainment, then sports would be the carnival show wrestling is, arguably worse. Just based on what we have learned about sports figures and industries in the last twenty years, none of the major sports would exist as they do today. We'd blame steroids, alcohol and industry politics for every time a player gets caught up in the law or 'baby momma drama' instead of him or her. Even worse is the perception that athletes are more likely to commit crimes than the rest of us. Here's some proof that view should be shattered.

All of this goes back to the opening question: how do you explain this to a child? Still forming the basics of right and wrong, children see what we see, but with little experience, understanding and pessimism that adults and teenagers have. How do we explain that there are many athletes, musicians, actors, writers (including journalists), etc. are flawed, even as they know right from wrong? When do we explain? Millions of children and adults watch wrestling and have those televised images of action imprinted. Their images are harder to forget than our own because wrongs are no more than don't hit, don't curse and don't put that there. Benoit's crime and the general reactions are not part of the grey area we discover as we age, but how we explain this to the admiring youth is not as black-and-white as we think.

Ask those who still respect some of these athletes.