Showing posts with label Danica Patrick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Danica Patrick. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Refueling

Stock car racing, specifically NASCAR, is something I admittedly know very little about. This has nothing to do with the stereotypes that many still point to in bashing the sport or its Southern roots or its predominantly white crowds. After all, if you can’t tell from previous posts, I’m a black slightly-above-casual hockey fan. It’s mostly because my brain locks whenever I get behind the wheel of a car, something being born and bred in New York City can do to you. Though many in my circle have an intense passion and knowledge of automotives, I know nothing about them other than how to move them or be a passenger in them.

So in advance, my discussion on the sport’s most popular organization is not based on knowing the dynamics of a race or the inner workings of the cars, drivers and teams themselves. In fact, I invite you to bless me with some intelligence on this arena so that when you (if you have not done so) watch the re-airings of this CNBC special, you’ll be able to share some insights that are not considered in-depth here.

As mentioned over the weekend, there’s nothing worse than an untimely malfunction. So this post, which was supposed to be published when the show originally aired, has been edited in its aftermath.

Almost two weeks ago, a question about NASCAR’s next six months was posed in the second part of Halftime:

For now, if (a HUGE if) Danica Patrick joins NASCAR after the season ends, how much of an impact would she make on a sport once considered America’s fastest growing sport just a few years ago?
This question came about because NASCAR was once considered the fastest growing sporting league in the United States, a mantle that Ultimate Fighting Championship has grabbed, taken down and jujitsued in the last three years. Despite a strong presence on television and successful expansion into western and northeastern markets over the past decade, NASCAR has taken some major blows during this recession.



It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the calamities in the automotive industry have a direct impact on team sponsorships and organizational support. Yet, the advertising dollars hurt just as much, if not more. This isn’t just about the decal above the exhaust pipe just to have real estate on the body of the car, but it’s also about branding segments of race coverage from broadcasters and online promotions to drive up interest in the sport and products teams use. Even what would be considered add-ons to advertising deals such as personal service agreements are being jettisoned (though in this case, it’s more about the malaise at General Motors).

So, in bringing back the Patrick question – whether this is genuine fan curiosity or another internal conversation within the media that happens to be passed as a story – the more important issue at hand wasn’t about the IndyCar star. I just wonder if Patrick and NASCAR would have been in the same sentence before the economy tanked.

Many a IRL driver have made the leap between circuits with mixed success, however, it’s widely assumed that Patrick will be the one that sticks with NASCAR because of her testosterone-fueled following. The obvious attention paid to this scenario centers around being an attractive female who has finally started to have the consistent success she has clamored for since she arrived on the scene a few years ago. For a select bunch, it’s just about Patrick being an attractive female.

If this scenario presented itself two or so years ago when NASCAR was the hottest American sporting entity, adding the Patrick brand to Dale Earnhardt  Jr., Jimmie Johnson, Tony Stewart and Jeff Gordon would have been akin to adding a small-market star player to a big-market franchise laden with stars of its own. That could still be the case if it ever happens, but in 2009/10, it could feel more like getting a one-and-done star in college basketball.

Of course, I could be completely off.

If you missed the CNBC special, Inside Track: Refueling the Business of NASCAR from Scribe favorite, Darren Rovell, check out the replays:

Sunday, July 19th Midnight ET
Friday, July 24th 10p ET
Tuesday, July 28th 10p ET
Sunday, August 2nd 9p ET
Friday, August 7th 10p ET

The show certainly provided more business insight on the circuit than this post shows, but I am curious to read your thoughts, regardless of interest level in the sport. I am extremely curious to know your thoughts on the importance of Patrick to the Indy circuit, a potential future in NASCAR and sports in general.

Say What?!?!: To quote the late Heath Ledger's Joker, "And heeeere... weeeee........ go!"

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Halftime (II)

Don't forget to read Part 1 of Halftime and check the new video from KeySpan Park.

Cue the classic Nas track.

Early July is a pretty intriguing time in sports. There’s the free agency frenzy in both the NBA and NHL, with the backdrop of a devastating recession. The sight of the word July is a boon to Major League Baseball as it prepares for the All-Star Game, the trading deadline and its only month as the lone major team sport in town. Wimbledon is going to give us championship battles during the holiday weekend, with storylines for both the men and women’s finals.

Yet, as Wednesday’s post discusses, we have entered the second half of 2009, a year that has sped by us with great games, historical events and utterly bizarre news. After reading about a few of the general issues headed into the next six months, here are some sport-specific thoughts you should pay attention to.

MLB: It looks as if the big boys are wielding heavy lumber into the postseason chase as all of the usually-despised big market teams (save the Cubs, at the moment) are in contention for the playoffs. Specifically, the Red Sox, Yankees, Dodgers, Mets and Phillies are in the running, while fans in Cleveland, San Diego, Washington D.C. and Oakland await NFL training camps to distract themselves from the misery.
For a sport that almost openly roots for the major market teams to go long in the postseason, it will be interesting to see not only how their players perform, but their stadiums. The demand is high in those cities, for sure, but if we are seeing empty seats immediately behind home plate in Citi Field and the new Yankee Stadium, what will we find in a few months?

You can’t even dream of getting Red Sox tickets during the season, let alone the playoffs. The Phillies might be fine considering that they would be defending their championship. Manny Ramirez’s presence in the Dodgers lineup creates absurd revenues for the front office. Yet in New York City, neither team can fill their ballpark, even as they play winning baseball. Ticket prices are such a turnoff at a time where fans would love to attend games that it would be hard to imagine that anyone would fork over entire paychecks/unemployment benefits for a Divisional Series game, let alone the World Series.


NFL: Donte’ Stallworth’s guilty plea to DUI manslaughter – in which he was given 30 days in jail, two years of house arrest, eight years of probation, 1,000 hours of community service and a lifetime suspension of his driver’s license – had set off a firestorm among fans and media. The immediate and most common reaction has been a comparison of his crime compared to that of Michael Vick’s prison sentence after his dog-fighting ring was discovered. However, the Humane Society and PETA gave the NFL enough grief (that’s being kind on PETA) about Vick that it could be credited with placing the pressure on law enforcement and the league to act swiftly on the former Atlanta Falcon.

As pondered in part one last night, will there be any word from any anti-drunk driving organization such as MADD in regards to Stallworth? Sadly, if there hasn’t been already, there may not be any time soon. Since this country and this particular league have a kinship to the alcohol industry, drunk driving does not illicit the same anger and conversations as performance-enhancing use, dog fighting or throwing three interceptions in the first half.


NBA: So the LeBron in 2010 campaign started this past season, but it will be in the final year of his contract that the real chaos begins. I say chaos because while LeBron-to-New York (or Brooklyn, if the Nets are still dreaming of the Barclays Center) has been assumed for some time, if you think that the Knicks and Nets are the only teams that will make a play for him, you must not follow the NBA outside of what the mainstream media says.

Unlike the Draft, where leading to the event, it’s insinuated that teams will intentionally lose games to have a better chance to secure the top pick for a potential star, free agency is about maneuvering salaries in order to attract the best available and newly unattached players.

We should keep an eye out on which other teams not only enter the fray for the current Cleveland Cavaliers star, but which teams have a legitimate shot in landing him. Many believe that James would inherit just about the same scenario of the lack of a strong supporting cast wherever he may go. When you also add to the fact that he didn’t need to be in a ‘major’ market to become a superstar, teams that are not in the New York, Los Angeles or Chicago areas have greater incentive to make a play so long as they have the foundation to win, or at least contend for championships during the span of his new contract.

Then again, this offseason will provide plenty of intrigue on its own without thinking so much about 2010.


NHL: This league has found remarkable success since emerging from the lockout in 2005. Much of this has to do with its young stars to go along with are arguably the most exciting playoffs in all of sports year after year.

What we have discovered in the last two years in particular is that whether people love or hate them, Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin have people watching and debating their skills, value and presence in sports. What is somewhat overlooked is that both players, along with some strong supporting casts have matched, if not trumped, attention paid in larger markets. Sure, Pittsburgh and Washington D.C. are not home of the Original Six teams, but both are fairly strong sports towns. The Steel City is already home to the current Super Bowl champion Steelers, but also a pretty profound hockey history. Meanwhile, outside of Cleveland, there’s probably not another American city as starved for a champion than D.C.; proved by their willingness to get behind the Capitals in recent seasons.

Early free agent movement points towards some of the bigger market teams as they try to supplant the Penguins and the Detroit Red Wings. Yet, with the NHL’s momentum being built without some of those squads, there’s a legitimate question headed into the fall: can the league continue its ascension without a contender in New York City or a relevant team in Toronto?

Finally, a few quick thoughts:

College football: Will the anti-BCS movement gain greater traction now that there has been some governmental wrangling in recent months?

College basketball: Who will be the most talked about rent-a-stars/one-and-done players with even fewer brand names next season?

Tennis: Will the US Open give birth to a new star beyond the usual names of Venus, Serena, Roger, Rafael, Andy Roddick, Maria Sharapova and Novak Djokovic?

Golf: Can the PGA learn how to live without a dominant Tiger Woods? Can the LPGA withstand some of the economic hits to some of their tournaments?

NASCAR: Next week, there will be a lengthier discussion on the country’s most popular motorsports organization. For now, if (a HUGE if) Danica Patrick joins NASCAR after the season ends, how much of an impact would she make on a sport once considered America’s fastest growing sport just a few years ago?