Showing posts with label jury duty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jury duty. Show all posts

Friday, April 3, 2009

Follow

Before anything else, let it be known that while it's been a rather challenging two-week period, it has been worthwhile in many aspects.

Without going too deep into a non-sports topic, I have walked away from my recent civil service with a greater respect and understanding of the judicial system. Jury duty is a nuisance as it is a forced interruption into twelve independent and relatively unconnected lives.

It requires that each participant does more than just show up and collect a check, though there have been people who have done just that.

It requires that each participant consider more than the physical and verbal evidence (read back of testimony, for example), but to consider the intangible evidence such as body language and the words left unsaid.

Most importantly, it requires that no matter what prejudices and experiences each juror has with the legal system, (s)he must be as open-minded and fair towards both sides of a conflict.

Trying to meet all of those tasks is easier for some than others. It is admittedly a challenge that is far easier in theory than in practice, yet I can say that regardless of the outcome, myself and my fellow jurors made the best efforts. That’s all anyone – the judge, prosecution, defense or the citizens themselves – can ask for.

And now, for the topic du jour.


It’s supposed to have been an important (albeit, rainy) day in New York baseball history as both new stadiums will be unveiled to the public for the first time with their primary tenants. After batting practice, testing the dirt and signing some autographs last night at the new Yankee Stadium, Derek Jeter talked to the media about his first impressions about the park. He also talked a bit about the anticipation of the Stadium’s first, being that he was the first to get a hit – a home run, apparently – in the building.

Yet, as asked by my editor, an article for this week’s New York Beacon (75 cents at select newsstands in New York City) discusses when he might get his last hit in pinstripes.
The likelihood that Jeter will be anything other than a Yankee – at least to this writer – is nil, unless one of two things happen. Either the team decides to show financial restraint and somehow decides to offer him an incentive-laden deal or the team believes that they can use a stronger arm on the left side of the infield. Yet, considering that Jeter is the Joe DiMaggio of this Yankee era both on and off the diamond, a divorce such as this could be far more embarrassing and heart-attack inducing to the fans than the Joe Torre debacle of 2007, the Billy Martin firings and George Steinbrenner’s feud with Dave Winfield combined.

Or maybe everyone will come to grips with the inevitable; there’s going to be a new guy between second and third some day. The question isn’t who so much as it is a question of when.

The Jeter Watch started recently as he will be a free agent after next season; a 35-year old shortstop whose defensive abilities have been criticized nonstop for a number of years, while his Hall of Fame offense will compel some team outside of the northeast corridor to make an obscenely rich contract offer.

While writing the Beacon piece, I couldn’t help but to think of how hard it’s going to be for the first After Jeter shortstop.

In fact, I couldn’t help but to conjure up the name Pete Myers.

If you can’t remember that name, Chicago Bulls fans might help you. He was the starting shooting guard after Michael Jordan retired in 1993. Myers wasn’t a bad player at all, he just wasn’t Mike.

Now, this isn’t saying that Jeter, whose marketability has grown over the past few seasons, is in the realm of Mike. Yet, at least within a team has storied as the Yankees, his eventual departure will cast a rather large shadow over those who will follow him.

This isn’t anything new. You can’t expect a franchise to suddenly fold when one of its most revered players (if not the most) calls it a career. However, when certain players walk away from the games, you can only hope that the fan base and management they leave behind are rather patient and welcoming.

Otherwise, you have an unsettling period as endured last spring and summer in Green Bay.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Well...

Not surprisingly, your Scribe has been selected as a juror. Without elaborating on the specifics, it'll be a little difficult to catch up with the happenings in the sports world for at least the next week. Add another trek to the alma mater and it'll be an unexpectedly slow week here on the blog. There will be posts for sure as with the courtroom hours, it'll be great to get home at least an hour earlier and finish some drafts. Yet, if it appears that I'm behind, spend six hours of your day listening and posing internal and outward debates on a crime.

Please pardon the potential fatigue.

However, two quick points.

For starters, when you have only played one game of basketball in almost five years, you tend to have a greater appreciation for those who do so for a living; not necessarily because of the attention and possible financial windfall for the very best, but for the sheer conditioning and athleticism that these women and men must maintain day in and day out. Whether it's practice or real-live action, it's such a marvel to know that what is mere recreation and seemingly easy to us is a daily challenge for this small circle of elite players.

Yes, even the NCAA-level players I recently tried to knock down a few notches based on the obsession of March Madness.

Secondly, there's a new poll on your right. If you have not voted, please do so and spread the word. This question may be more timely based on the current NBA race, however, it applies to all sports and all levels.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Duty

Things may be slow in terms of discussing events, at least for a day or two.

Tomorrow, yours truly reports for jury duty.



After being selected as a preliminary juror a few years back, it appears that New York County can't stop, won't stop (cue mid-90s Puffy/Diddy).

Of course, this has been known for about a month, but this past week did bring about some interesting news in the world of civic responsibility.

Just don't expect me to Twitter about it... now or ever.

Enjoy these.

Say What?!?!: Speaking of 12 Angry Men (classic 1957 original and a pretty decent remake forty years later), I was just thinking of one of the few good ideas MTV ever had, 12 Angry Viewers.
That brought about a vivid and not-so-fond memory of being a part of a tryout for an episode when some of the biggest poseurs in human history showed up and displayed enough stereotypes to 'earn' face time later that month.
Meanwhile, this future Scribe moved on to bigger and better things such as winning the Period 4 World Floor Hockey championship in high school later that year. Oh, the memories.